Climate Change.

Here is a link to a website. The author of the post is me. https://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=31976576

Here are the contents.

In the research of the very real phenomenon of Climate Change I wish to draw your attention to a link that has already been posted. This is the link.

 https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2018/jan/09/the-imminent-mini-ice-age-myth-is-back-and-its-still-wrong

I just thought I would post the link to the newspaper article first…. Just to show you how shallow it is. 

In a previous post I showed you I was intrigued by an almost offhand comment from an approved scientist who should know better or who was perhaps misquoted. 

Anyone who is connected to the world of human health will tell you the human heart is a fairly important organ. Likewise the Sun is a fairly important component of the solar System. 

If the Sun ain’t there the world sinks to a few degrees Kelvin rather fast. 

The human heart has a “beat” it’s not a simple sinusoidal wave but is is a beat and probably has several components to it. I have never studied it incidentally. 

However if it’s rhythm is disturbed, and it’s output is “stochastic” then we are talking about a serious heart condition and the end of the life of the patient.

Same with the Sun. The good news is the Suns heartbeat is as solid as ever and the “patient” is in good health. You will hear Professor Valentina Zharkova say exactly that. 

Here is a presentation by her in full. I only found this utube video a few days ago, but to me the science is first rate. The “attitude” is first rate as is the Audience. Some of the audience look to be known reprobates within the “Climate Change” debate, and I have only just discovered who “Tallbloke” is. 

Yeah … like him too.

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPjdygy7Qhs

Now OK her voice is high and heavily accented but I can listen to it. Sure there are a few fopas, we all do those.

Yes, sure, you will see (and have seen) I pinch some of her ideas and statements … the reason is they are good. Call me an acolyte for scientific purposes -g-

Watching this stuff makes my heart sing. It really does. 

Notice it is all unfunded. It is done just out of curiosity. If it was up to me Professor Valentina Zharkova would get at least half the IPCC “Climate change” budget. In fact I would make it 80%+ and give half to “Tallbloke” and Zarkova each. They would need to outsource most of the work as time is short and the work needs to be done in parallel, not in series. 

I am pleased to hear from anyone who doesn’t seem to think this lecture is not relevant to the “Climate Change” debate. 

Get this message though. Just because the IPCC etc etc say something, forgive me if I just do not believe what they say in a religious sense. Far as I can tell they are way off, way further off then any of Einsteins detractors ever were. Nobody listened to him either, not for a while anyway.

One Reply to “Climate Change.”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.